- Check out Part I of this series (‘FDA Advisory Committee Meeting on Ampligen Pt I: Dueling Presentation Set Stage for Critical Vote’) on the Simmaron Foundations Website here
While the FDA statistical team was highly critical of the drug, the FDA put together a Committee that gave Hemispherx a fighting chance. The Committee included a Patient Advocate who was a patient and CFSAC member (Alaine Perry, MPH), the chair of the federal advisory committee on CFS (CFSAC), Gailen Marshall, MD, Ph.D, the head of the CDC’s CFS program, Dr. Unger, MD, Ph.D, and an ME/CFS researcher and advocate, Dr. Komaroff, MD. The presence of these chronic fatigue syndrome professionals led some to project a close and winning vote for approval.
The biostatisticians were expected to handily vote down the drug with the ME/CFS representatives voting for it and a chunk of others on the fence. Hemispherx knew they needed panel members who could look past the mistakes and changes in study design and focus on the needs of the community. The strong core of ME/CFS professionals was expected, at least by the community, to speak for the needs of the community.
It turned out that, expect for Alaine Perry they didn’t. Gailen Marshall voted for approval at every turn but never let loose his at times quite convincing oratory to try and rally support based on the community needs. (He and others were told by the FDA not to let moving testimony from the patients to unduly sway their votes.) Two professionals with decades of experience with ME/CFS, Dr. Komaroff and Dr. Unger, were silent throughout.
Feeling the opportunity slipping away Patient Advocate, Alaine Perry, pulled out all the stops. Literally stopping the discussion in its tracks she presented a lengthy, moving and articulate soliloquy on the needs of ME/CFS patients. Her presentation was powerful enough that I wondered if she was going to turn the whole thing around by herself, but it was not to be.
It turned out that the biostatisticians voted down the drug, several key ME/CFS professionals did the same and Ampligen got support from several members without obvious connections to the disorder..
Dr. Komaroff and Dr Unger ended up being the critical votes. Enough other members voted for the drug that if these two members had voted yes, the FDA would have had considerable difficulty not approving the drug in some fashion. Two more yes votes would have made the safety and efficacy votes 7-6 against approval and the summary vote including both safety and efficacy 7-6 for approval plus there was the solid win (9-4) on the vote whether the safety evidence was good enough for marketing (approval).
Sign the Petition to Approve Ampligen Here
With close votes on whether safety and efficacy had been substantiated, a whopping win indicating that the panel felt the communities needs trumped any safety concerns, and a close summary vote for approval, it would have been hard for the FDA not to conditionally approve the drug with restrictions…
That, of course, was not to be and it was primarily because of two votes by ME/CFS professionals. Dr. Komaroff was one of five (of 13 members) not to vote yes once for the drug and Dr. Unger voted once for approval. Dr. Komaroff, of course, has been a champion for ME/CFS for many years. He advocated for it when it was really not popular to do so and continues to present lectures and occasionally author research papers on it. Having a Harvard professor on the ME/CFS bench has always been helpful.
Dr. Komaroff ‘s history on review committees has been mixed. Early in this disease’s history he voted for the chronic fatigue syndrome name (he’s regretted it ever since), and as part of a CDC review committee, he strongly supported Dr. Reeves CDC CFS program just before the CFSAC committee unaimouslyvoted that Dr. Reeves had to go, and not long before the CDC removed Dr. Reeves from that position. Now he was unable vote once for Ampligen and was, not surprisingly, confronted by angry patients after the meeting. Dr. Komaroff has, at times, been a great advocate and but I’ll hold my breath if he’s on another review committee for this disorder.
Dr. Unger may have had a more difficult task. As head of the CDC’s CFS program she was representing the agency and it’s possible she might have had difficulty with her peers voting for a dataset with issues. On the other hand, she’s sat through dozens and dozens of incredibly poignant patient presentations , she knows the cost of this illness, she’s very clear subsets are present – which suggests no drugs are going to work particularly well in clinical trials – and yet she voted against the drug three out of four times.
Dr. Klimas was not on the committee but she represents the view of a physician on the ground and recently released a statement regarding Ampligen on News Medical in which she strongly urged the FDA to approve Ampligen. She stated that “The real loser is not Ampligen, but CFS/ME patients whose daily suffering continues to be unabated”. She noted that mental health or exercise therapies do not get at the heart of ME/CFS and that the finding that subgroup of patients showed marked improvement and that should have been enough. She reminded the FDA that they’d approved MS drugs without biomarkers which had similar success rates as Ampligen. (She also noted there were now 7 approved drugs for MS).
Dr. Klimas noted there were no biomarkers to track success in FDA approved drugs for MS, and if the Committee had used the same standards they would have approved Ampligen.
“The advisory panel saw MS as a serious disease that required interventions ASAP, and were willing to accept that clinicians would better understand where to use the first drugs with more experience using them. Now there are seven approved drugs for MS that have significantly improved quality of life for patients. But they are not willing to use the same logic for Ampligen.”
She stated she would love to see a conclusive biomarker but, and this is probably the key point, as a physician, she could not agree with the Advisory committee’s votes.
“As a physician, I could live with this decision if I had other effective therapies to treat my CFS/ME patients. But I do not.”
Dr. Bateman also emphasized the poor range of available treatments in her testimony, and it may be this ingrained understanding of the suffering present in the ME/CFS community, bought by years of almost daily interactions with them, that made the difference in how some of the committee members did or didn’t vote.
The ME/CFS professionals were surely aware of the consequences of their votes. It’s unrealistic to think that after 20 years in the FDA pipeline that Hemispherx – a small drug company with little funding – would simply go out and do another study. If Hemispherx, after all, was unable to respond to an FDA demand three years ago to do a study, why would they be able to do one now? The most likely outcome of the no votes was the end the road for Ampligen and chronic fatigue syndrome, and that’s what makes Dr. Komaroff’s and Dr. Unger’s votes, in particular, so difficult to swallow.
To my assertion that her no vote was very likely a vote to kill Ampligen permanently for a community with no FDA approved drugs and no other drugs in sight, an FDA rep simply said that wasn’t any of her business. An FDA that has pledged to do what it can to bring needed drugs to underserved patients might want to put that kind of issue, though, into, their calculations.
Hemispherx has to take responsibility as well. One had the feeling that the FDA investigators simply didn’t trust them. Surely this small company in its first ever trials, would, in retrospect, have done things differently. They would have been more focused on dotting their i’s and crossing their T’s. The decision to halt a year long trial that would have provided much stronger data was probably a major error.
In the end, though it was about the drug and the ME/CFS community; this drug is clearly very helpful for some people with ME/CFS and somehow that should have been enough.
The Votes - taken From Kim McCleary’s Research1st post
|Member||Is there substantial evidence of efficacy?||Has safety been adequately assessed?||Is the safety profile adequate for approval?||Do the safety and efficacy data support approval?|
|Lisa Gualtieri, PhD, ScM (R)||No||No||No||No|
|Robert Lahita, MD, PhD (R)||Left early; did not vote|
|I Jon Russell, MD, PhD (R)||No||Yes||Yes||No|
|Larry Borish, MD (T)||Yes||No||Yes||Yes|
|Lenore Buckley, MD, PhD (T)||No||No||No||No|
|Ralph D’Agostino, Sr., PhD (T)||No||No||No||No|
|Jacqueline Gardner, MPH, PhD (T)||No||No||Yes||No|
|Sean Hennessy, PharmD, PhD (T)||No||No||Yes||Yes|
|Anthony Komaroff, MD, MA (T)||No||No||No||No|
|Gailen Marshall, Jr., MD, PhD (T)||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Alaine Perry, MPH (T)||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Matthew Rudorfer, MD (T)||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Elizabeth Unger, PhD, MD (T)||No||No||Yes||No|
|James Ware, PhD (T)||No||No||No||No|
|FINAL VOTE||No: 9
Did not vote: 1
Did not vote: 1
Did not vote: 1
Did not vote: 1
A Frustrated Team
Hemispherx employees left the meeting dismayed, frustrated and stunned. Bob Miller, who was part of the team, relayed that the team felt prepared after lunch to answer the FDA’s questions during the discussion period but didn’t feel they were provided equal chances to do so. They felt critical information was left on the table. I remembered the moderator sesveral times cutting off Hemispherx or not allowing them to present. .
Where To Now?
It’s NOT a done deal. Ampligen didn’t win out but it did get a potentially critically yes vote.
While the panel did not vote that Hemispherx had sufficiently proved that Ampligen was effective or safe enough for full approval, they did vote (8-5) that Hemispherx had shown Ampligen was safe enough for ‘marketing’. This means that most of the panel asserted that, given the needs of this population, Hemispherx had provided enough safety data for the community to be given a shot at the drug.
Sign the Petition to Approve Ampligen Here
That’s a huge opening. That’s a prescription forconditional approval with restrictions by the FDA and that was made possible by the huge turnout by the ME/CFS population; a turnout the FDA called overwhelming, a turnout that broke their servers and a turnout that made them very aware of how much this community wants to have access to this drug.
Now, with the FDA in decision-making mode let’s make their decision as a difficult a one as can be. We are a force to be reckoned with. We deserve access to this drug. We know it works. We know every doctor that has used it for the past ten years strongly supports it.
Let’s bring Ampligen home for the ME/CFS Community.
Like the blog? Make sure you don’t miss the latest on ME/CFS and FM treatment and research news by registering for our free ME/CFS and Fibromyalgia blog here.